Explore and learn the 5 scenarios for 2050, shown below. Then vote.
Recreation in Bonneville Trout

The Story

Utah invests in outdoor recreational facilities (parks, trails, campgrounds, picnic sites, etc.) at half the rate needed to keep up with growth in usage. The increase in population, tourism, and per person use of recreational facilities causes some overcrowding. We do not create or implement a long-range strategy to develop or maintain recreational areas, and we also under-invest in facility maintenance. As population grows westward along the Wasatch Front, few new facilities are built in the mountains on the west sides of the Wasatch Front counties. Trails, parks, and open spaces are disconnected.

 

Results

  • We build about half the recreational facilities needed to accommodate growth.
  • Cost per household for new recreational facilities is $1,200 spread over 35 years, paid from federal, state, and local governments; developers; and users.
  • Big and Little Cottonwood, American Fork, Provo, and other east-side canyons are heavily used.
  • Tension and conflict increase between user groups.
  • Fewer tourists, employees, and employers are drawn to Utah.

Background

Outdoor recreation is vital to a high quality of life and strong economy in Utah. The lives and health of Utahns are improved as they visit parks and trails close to their homes, go on excursions to nearby canyons and wild areas, and travel to national and state parks and other outdoor destinations. Our outdoor recreation and the quality of life it provides attract many employees, businesses, and tourists to Utah, helping improve and grow the state’s economy. Recreation and tourism in Utah account for:

Learn More

  • 6.3 million visits to national parks each year.
  • 3.8 million visits by skiers each year.
  • 124,000 jobs.
  • $6.9 billion in revenue each year.

As Utah’s population increases in the coming decades, our recreational resources will be used more than ever before. If we do not invest in new recreational facilities (parks, trails, campgrounds, picnic areas, etc.), access to recreation will decrease and our ability to enjoy the outdoors will diminish. However, a long-range strategy to develop and maintain Utah’s many different recreational facilities could improve our ability to access and enjoy outdoor recreation.

Utah’s population will nearly double by 2050, and if we are to meet growing demand we will need to invest in creating new recreational facilities. Doubling the miles of Utah’s soft surface trails would cost $560 million; doubling hard surface trails, $38 million; doubling campgrounds, $71 million; and doubling picnic areas, $100 million. Doubling the acreage of city and local parks would cost $4.1 billion—far more expensive than doubling all the other recreational facilities combined. A substantial portion of this cost may be covered by city and county park impact fees, which are paid by developers and passed on to purchasers of new homes. In addition, there are a variety of revenue sources that could be used to pay for the improvements, ranging from impact fees and federal funds to user fees.

Compare & Favorite Recreation in Each Scenario
Select your favorite outcome to tell us which outcome you prefer and keep track of which scenario you like.