Explore and learn the 5 scenarios for 2050, shown below. Then vote.
Transportation & Communities in Bonneville Trout

The Story

The development trends of the last two decades continue. By 2050, most housing is single-family homes. Based on what Utahns want and can afford, significantly fewer townhomes, apartments, and small lots are available than needed. Many communities establish minimum lot sizes, which prevents a full range of housing options from being built. Because housing is generally far from jobs, shopping, and public transportation, people have to drive more and over long distances.

Most transportation investments are spent on building new roads, with some spent on improving the bus network. Because homes and businesses are more spread out, local infrastructure, like pipes and roads, must stretch farther to reach each building. The cost of maintaining and constructing such infrastructure is therefore higher.

Parks and trails are sparse and disconnected.

Results

  • Total new developed acres: 373,000
  • Households within one mile of a center with daily services: 15%
  • Housing mix: Does not match what Utahns will need. Multi-family units and townhomes are too few and large-lot, single-family homes are too expensive for many Utahns.


  • Total new local capital infrastructure costs: Higher, because growth is more spread out, primarily in large-lot, single-family suburbs
  • Wasatch Front households within a half mile of high-frequency public transportation: 36%
  • Transportation investment: mostly roads, modest bus improvements.
  • 5.3% of commute trips on the Wasatch Front are on public transportation.

Background

How we build our communities and link them together affects our day-to-day lives. It determines how quickly and easily we can access work, shopping, and recreation and what mode of transportation we take to get there. How we design our communities also affects household costs, taxes, and other expenses.

Learn More

When communities are organized so that people live close to shopping, jobs, and recreation, people need to drive less, which in turn reduces travel times, the cost of building and maintaining roads, household transportation costs (gas, car maintenance, etc.), and air pollutants.

When communities are more spread out, roads, pipes, and other utilities must stretch farther to reach each household and thus become more expensive to build and maintain. In addition, more spread out communities take away more of our farmland and open spaces.

The topic of Transportation and Communities partially or significantly affects Utah in many other topics:

  • Agriculture is affected by how many farms must be sold to accommodate expanding communities.
  • Air Quality is affected by how energy efficient our buildings are and our transportation choices.
  • Recreation, as well as our health, is affected by whether or not we have walkable/bikable communities and sufficient trails and parks.
  • Disaster Resilience is affected by how we construct buildings and whether or not we build in areas prone to earthquakes, floods, and fires.
  • Housing and Cost of Living are affected by how well communities supply the types of housing Utahns want and can afford; by the cost of building roads, pipes, and other infrastructure, which impacts how much Utahns pay in taxes, utility bills, and fees; and by how easily Utahns can walk, bike, take public transit, or drive short distances—all of which impact household transportation costs.
  • Energy is affected by the energy efficiency of our buildings and by our modes of transportation.
  • Water is affected by how many farms are converted to homes and businesses; by how big our yards are and how we landscape; and by how much agricultural water is taken for homes and businesses.
  • Jobs and Economy are affected by all of the above aspects of urban growth.
Compare & Favorite Transportation & Communities in Each Scenario
Select your favorite outcome to tell us which outcome you prefer and keep track of which scenario you like.