Explore and learn the 5 scenarios for 2050, shown below. Then vote.
Housing & Cost of Living in Allosaurus

The Story

By 2050, most Utahns live in either large-lot homes in the suburbs or high-rise buildings in the cities. Because many suburban areas do not allow apartments, condominiums, townhomes, or small lots, most multifamily housing is located in the downtowns of cities such as Salt Lake City, Provo, Ogden, and Sandy. High-rise buildings have high construction costs, and large suburban homes are also expensive, making housing unaffordable for many. Utah has fewer townhomes, low-rise apartments, condominiums, duplexes, and small-lot homes than needed. As a result:

  • Utahns must spend more money on housing and less on other needs.
  • More people require public assistance for housing and other needs.
  • People with different incomes generally do not live in the same neighborhoods, limiting opportunities for low-wage earners and their children.
  • Transportation costs are low for Utahns living downtown because they can walk, bike, take public transportation, or drive short distances to destinations.
  • Transportation costs are high for Utahns living in suburban areas because public transportation is limited and people must drive longer distances to reach destinations.

Results

  • Over half of households along the Wasatch Front are within a half-mile of high-frequency public transportation.

  • Housing supply does not match what people can afford.

  • The average household spends $19,883 per year for transportation.
  • Local infrastructure (roads, water, sewer, etc.) costs $22,805 per household.
  • 29% of households are within one mile of a center with daily services.

Background

Reasonably priced housing and an affordable cost of living are vital for maintaining a high quality of life and improving Utah’s economy. Utahns spend a significant portion of their monthly budgets on housing and transportation. The less we spend on these needs, the more we have left to spend on other goods and services. As housing and transportation costs rise, more Utahns have difficulty finding a decent place to live and meeting monthly expenses without public assistance. However, if the cost of living is affordable, Utahns are more likely to stay and workers and employers are more likely to come to the state, improving Utah’s economy.

Learn More

Housing Costs
To maintain affordable housing, the supply of housing types must match Utahns’ wants and incomes. If Utahns desire to live in a housing type (such as townhomes or apartments) that is in short supply, housing costs will increase for many. Providing a variety of housing options helps ensure that everyone has a good, affordable place to call home. Supplying the right mix of housing is challenging, however, because people’s housing needs evolve as their family size, income, job locations, or other circumstances change. In addition, Utahns’ demand for housing is changing as Baby Boomers age, average family size decreases, land for housing near job centers becomes less available, and market preferences change.

Increased costs for local infrastructure like roads and pipes can also increase the price of housing, because these expenses are typically passed on to homebuyers and renters, or included in tax bills.

Transportation Costs
Transportation costs are also a large part of a typical family’s budget. These costs are determined by how close housing is to jobs and daily needs and by the availability of good public transportation. If Utahns can drive less and own fewer or no vehicles, transportation costs will lower.

 

* Lowest 20% of Utah households

Compare & Favorite Housing & Cost of Living in Each Scenario
Select your favorite outcome to tell us which outcome you prefer and keep track of which scenario you like.